now i'm using the tf basaltex 130. i haven't used the new aerogel 4d pro gt-x, but have had a swing with the previous aerogel pro gt model. i think the biggest differences will be head weight, vibration and power/accuracy. the newest tf 130 is somewhat head-heavy. (the tf balastex 140 has a more even balance) the frame does vibrate, but with the introduction of basaltex in the shaft, i find that there's less vibration than previous tf models. you can get a lot of power out of the latest tf and reasonably good accuracy for drops. at first, i loved the tf, but now i find the vibration is getting on my nerves and the racket feels a little unstable in my hand. i use a vibration dampner, but it really destroys the feel for the ball.

dunlop pro gt is totally different. it's head light and really easy to whip around on court. i was also impressed by how little vibration there is in the frame and how much more accurate my shots felt. i think dunlop introduced 4d to address some complaints that the previous pro gt model lacked a little power. so i'm guessing 4d stiffens the frame in key areas, but i would very much like to hear from someone who's played with the pro gt-x. i was thinking of buying one myself, but if 4d stiffens the frame too much or has otherwise detracts from the overall feel of the racket, then i may just buy the pro gt.

Back to top

Well I play with the Tecnifibre 130 Basaltex, and first impressions I really liked it. Found it had a great balance, perfect weight with good power. Been playing about 6 months now with it and I cant say i still feel the same way about it. I think Id prefer a racket around 140 grams solely for the extra power and stability. Id maybe try the Basaltex 140.  I never played with the Dunlop gt pro but I know someone who loves that racket, I never personally tried any dunlops. So what it really comes down to is what shape you prefer. Tear drop shapes tend to give more power while rackets with throats are more stabil.

Back to top